Related Questions
A total of 5 cryptocurrency questions
Share Your Thoughts with BYDFi
Trending
POLAND ERUPTS: President’s Shock Veto Sparks a National War Over Crypto Freedom
BREAKING: Polish President Vetoes Landmark Crypto Bill in Stunning Move, Sparking Freedom vs. Chaos Political Showdown
Warsaw, Poland – In a dramatic political maneuver that has thrown the nation's financial future into the spotlight, Polish President Karol Nawrocki has vetoed the highly contentious Crypto-Asset Market Act, branding it a dangerous threat to civil liberties and economic innovation. The veto, announced late Monday, sets the stage for a fierce constitutional clash and has cleaved the Polish political landscape into two opposing camps: one heralding it as a victory for freedom, the other condemning it as an invitation to financial chaos.
The President's Stand: A Defense of Freedom and Innovation
President Nawrocki's veto was not a mere procedural step, but a forceful ideological declaration. His office issued a blistering critique of the bill, which had previously cleared parliamentary approval, framing the decision as a necessary defense of core Polish values.
The President's core objections are threefold:
1- The Draconian Website-Blocking Power: The bill granted authorities sweeping, opaque powers to block websites operating in the crypto market with minimal oversight. "This provision creates a tool for censorship that can be easily abused," the presidential statement argued. It is a direct threat to digital freedoms and sets a dangerous precedent that undermines the openness of the internet in Poland.
2- A Bureaucratic Monster of "Overregulation": The president lambasted the bill's extreme complexity—a dense, sprawling document that critics say only lobbyists and lawyers could love. This is not regulation; this is suffocation, Nawrocki stated. He contrasted Poland's approach with the more streamlined, business-friendly frameworks of neighbors like the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Hungary, arguing that the bill would achieve one thing only: "Overregulation is the fastest way to drive innovative companies, talent, and tax revenue to Vilnius, Prague, or Malta.
3- Stifling Competition, Killing the Startup Spirit: A particularly criticized aspect was the structure of prohibitive supervisory fees. The president warned that these fees were calibrated to benefit only deep-pocketed foreign corporations and traditional banks, while crushing domestic Polish startups and entrepreneurs. This is a perverse reversal of logic. Instead of fostering a competitive, homegrown market, it kills it in its cradle. It is a direct attack on Polish innovation and ambition, he asserted.
Political Backlash: Accusations of Choosing Chaos
The veto triggered an immediate and furious response from the heart of the government, revealing a deep rift within the ruling coalition.
1- Finance Minister Andrzej Domański took to X with a stark warning: As a result of abuses in this market, 20% of clients are already losing their money. By vetoing this bill, the President has chosen chaos. He must now bear full responsibility for the consequences. His post was accompanied by charts implying rising consumer risks without regulation.
2- Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski echoed the sentiment, framing the veto as an abandonment of consumer protection. "The purpose of this law was to bring order to the wild west of crypto. When the speculative bubble bursts and thousands of Polish families lose their savings, they will know exactly who to thank, he posted, aiming his remarks directly at the president's constituency.
The government's narrative is clear: the veto leaves Polish consumers dangerously exposed to fraud and market manipulation in a volatile sector, prioritizing ideological purity over practical safety.
Crypto Community Fights Back: A Historic Victory for Common Sense
In stark contrast, the veto was met with jubilation and relief by the Polish crypto industry, libertarian politicians, and digital advocates.
1- Tomasz Mentzen, a prominent pro-crypto politician who had publicly campaigned against the bill, hailed the decision: The President has listened to reason and to the people. This veto protects Poles from becoming a digitally surveilled colony and keeps our economy open to the future.
2- Economist and blockchain expert Krzysztof Piech dismantled the government's criticism. "Holding the president responsible for scams is absurd. That is the job of the police and financial regulators under existing laws, he argued. He also delivered the community's trump card: "The panic is manufactured. The EU's comprehensive MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) regulations come into full force across all member states in July 2026. This rushed, flawed Polish law was unnecessary and would have only created a contradictory, hostile local regime for two years before being superseded by EU law.
What Happens Next? A Nation at a Regulatory Crossroads
The political drama is now entering a new phase with significant implications.
- Legislative Limbo: The bill returns to the lower house of parliament, the Sejm. To override a presidential veto, the government must muster a three-fifths supermajority—a significantly higher threshold than the simple majority used to pass it initially. This will be a major test of the ruling coalition's cohesion and strength.
- The MiCA Shadow: The impending EU-wide MiCA regulations loom large over the debate. Opponents of the vetoed bill ask: If MiCA is coming, why the rush with a potentially harmful national law? Proponents counter that Poland cannot afford a two-year regulatory vacuum where consumers are unprotected.
- Global Signal: Poland, as one of Central Europe's largest economies, is sending a signal to the global crypto industry. The president's veto is being interpreted internationally as a potential openness to a more innovation-friendly approach, potentially attracting projects wary of heavier-handed regimes in other EU nations.
BOTTOM LINE
President Nawrocki's veto is more than a policy dispute; it is a high-stakes battle over Poland's identity in the digital age. It pits a vision of a tightly controlled, state-protected market against one of entrepreneurial freedom and minimal interference, all under the shadow of overarching EU rules. The coming weeks will determine whether Poland's crypto landscape becomes a protected fortress or an open frontier—a decision that will resonate far beyond its borders.
- Buy Crypto in Minutes — Start Trading on BYDFi Today
B22389817 · 2026-01-20 · 15 days agoBitcoin Quantum Risk: Are Satoshi’s Coins Safe?
Key Takeaways:
- Quantum computers using Shor's Algorithm could theoretically derive private keys from public keys on the Bitcoin network.
- "Satoshi Era" wallets (2009-2010) are most vulnerable because their public keys are exposed on the blockchain.
- New technologies like Zero-Knowledge STARKs and post-quantum cryptography are being developed to upgrade Bitcoin's defenses.
Bitcoin quantum risk is the ultimate "end of days" scenario for cryptocurrency investors. For over a decade, skeptics have warned that a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could crack the Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) that secures the blockchain. If this happened, a hacker could theoretically derive private keys from public keys and steal funds.
For a long time, this was science fiction. But as we move through 2026, advances in quantum computing by companies like Google and IBM are moving us closer to this reality. To understand if your assets are safe, you first need to understand the machinery that protects them and the new technology threatening to break it.
How Does Bitcoin’s Security Actually Work?
To understand the threat, we have to look at the lock on the door. The Bitcoin blockchain is essentially a public ledger of transactions. To prove you own the Bitcoin at a specific address, you use a digital signature generated by a "Private Key."
This system relies on a mathematical relationship between your Private Key (which you keep secret) and your Public Key (which is visible). In the current model, it is easy to generate a Public Key from a Private Key.
However, going backward—calculating the Private Key from the Public Key—is effectively impossible. It would take a classical supercomputer millions of years to solve the math. This one-way mathematical street is the foundation of all crypto security.
How Does Shor's Algorithm Change the Game?
The engine behind the Bitcoin quantum risk is a concept called Shor’s Algorithm. Invented by Peter Shor in 1994, it is a method designed specifically for quantum computers to find the prime factors of integers at incredible speeds.
Quantum computers use "qubits" which can exist in multiple states simultaneously. This allows them to shortcut the math. Shor’s Algorithm turns the "impossible" calculation of deriving a Private Key into a task that could take just a few hours. If a computer can run this algorithm effectively, it breaks the one-way street, allowing hackers to unlock wallets without the password.
What Is Post-Quantum Cryptography?
The industry is not sitting idle. Developers are actively working on Post-Quantum Cryptography. This term refers to a new class of cryptographic algorithms that are secure against both quantum and classical computers.
Unlike current encryption which relies on factoring large numbers (which quantum computers are good at), post-quantum algorithms rely on complex mathematical problems like "lattice-based cryptography." These are problems that even a quantum computer cannot solve efficiently. Implementing these algorithms would render the quantum threat useless.
What Are Zero-Knowledge STARKs?
One of the most promising post-quantum solutions involves Zero-Knowledge STARKs (Scalable Transparent Arguments of Knowledge).
A STARK is a type of cryptographic proof. It allows one party to prove to another that they know a secret (like a private key) without revealing the secret itself. Crucially, STARKs rely on "hash functions" rather than elliptic curves.
Hash functions are resistant to quantum attacks. Because STARKs use this quantum-safe math, they are considered one of the best upgrades for the Bitcoin network. The company BTQ recently launched a testnet called "Preon" to demonstrate how these proofs can secure transactions against quantum threats.
Why Are Old Bitcoins Vulnerable?
Despite these solutions, Bitcoin quantum risk remains high for one specific group: early adopters. In 2009 and 2010, Bitcoin used "Pay-to-Public-Key" (P2PK) addresses.
In these old wallets, the Public Key is recorded directly on the blockchain. Because the Public Key is exposed, a quantum computer could attack it immediately. This puts the massive stash of Bitcoin held by Satoshi Nakamoto at risk.
Modern wallets (P2PKH) are safer because they "hash" the public key. Since quantum computers cannot reverse a hash, modern users are safe as long as they don't reuse addresses.
Conclusion
Quantum computers are coming, but they are not the death of crypto. They are simply the next hurdle in the evolution of digital security. By transitioning to post-quantum standards like ZK-STARKs, the industry is building a shield that even the most powerful computers cannot break.
You don't need to understand quantum mechanics to be a successful investor; you just need to trust the right tools. Register at BYDFi today to trade Bitcoin on a secure, modern platform that stays ahead of the technological curve.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: When will quantum computers be able to hack Bitcoin?
A: Experts estimate it could take another 10 to 30 years to build a quantum computer powerful enough to break Bitcoin’s encryption using Shor's Algorithm.Q: Are my Bitcoins on an exchange safe?
A: Yes. Exchanges use modern address formats and cold storage protocols that use hashing, making them resistant to current Bitcoin quantum risk.Q: What happens if I have an old 2010 wallet?
A: You should move your funds to a new, modern wallet immediately. Once you move the funds, they are protected by the new hashing standards.2026-01-26 · 9 days agoCrypto Bans in 2026: Where is Bitcoin Still Illegal?
Key Takeaway: The world is splitting into two camps: nations embracing digital assets and nations banning them to protect their central banks. Knowing the difference is vital for global travelers and investors.
In 2026, the narrative around cryptocurrency has shifted dramatically. With major economies like the US, UK, and Hong Kong fully integrating digital assets into their financial systems via ETFs and clear laws, it feels like crypto has won.
But look closer at the map, and you will see a different story.
There are still vast pockets of the world where owning Bitcoin is not just difficult; it is a crime. The global regulatory landscape has fractured. While the West builds bridges to Web3, other nations are building walls. Understanding where these walls are—and why they exist—is critical for anyone navigating the global digital economy.
The Motivations Behind the Ban
Why would a country ban innovation? The answer is rarely about "protecting users" from volatility. It is almost always about control.
Governments in nations with unstable currencies fear Capital Flight. If citizens can easily swap their inflating local currency for Bitcoin or USDT, the local currency collapses even faster.
Furthermore, the rise of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) has created a conflict of interest. Authoritarian regimes want to launch their own digital money that they can track and control. They view decentralized cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin as direct competitors that need to be eliminated to clear the path for their state-backed surveillance coins.
The "Absolute Ban" Countries
In these jurisdictions, everything is illegal. You cannot trade, you cannot pay with crypto, and banks are forbidden from touching it.
China remains the most prominent example. despite being a former hub for mining, the government enacted a sweeping ban on all crypto transactions and mining activities. While citizens still find ways to trade peer-to-peer (P2P), the legal risk is immense.
Egypt and Algeria also maintain strict prohibitions. In Egypt, religious decrees (fatwas) have been issued declaring Bitcoin "haram" (forbidden) due to its speculative nature, backing up the legal ban with cultural and religious pressure.
The "Implicit Ban" (Banking Blockades)
Other countries claim crypto is legal, but they make it impossible to use. This is the "Banking Blockade" strategy.
In countries like Nigeria (historically) or Saudi Arabia, the government might not arrest you for holding a wallet, but they will forbid banks from processing transfers to crypto exchanges.
This forces the market underground. It creates a massive "Shadow Economy" where trading happens entirely via P2P networks or cash-in-person deals. It is a testament to the resilience of crypto: even when the state turns off the banking rails, the people find a way to transact.
The Gray Zone is Shrinking
The good news is that the list of hostile nations is shrinking, not growing.
Countries that were previously skeptical are realizing that bans don't work; they just push tax revenue offshore. We are seeing a trend of "Regulation over Prohibition." Nations are now racing to create frameworks to tax and monitor crypto rather than ban it outright.
They understand that in 2026, banning crypto is like banning the internet in 1995. It doesn't stop the technology; it just ensures your country gets left behind in the digital dark ages.
Navigating the Map
For the digital nomad or the global investor, this patchwork of laws creates complexity. You need to know if your destination allows you to access your funds.
Using a VPN might get you past a firewall, but it won't help you off-ramp fiat if the local banks are hostile. The safest strategy is to operate within jurisdictions that respect property rights and digital innovation.
Conclusion
The geopolitical divide is clear. On one side, we have open financial systems integrating with the blockchain. On the other, we have closed systems fighting a losing battle against decentralized money.
Fortunately, the digital world has no borders. Regardless of where you are physically located, you can access the global economy through the right infrastructure.
Register at BYDFi today to trade on a platform that serves the global community, ensuring you have access to your digital assets whenever and wherever you need them.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: Is it illegal to own crypto in China?
A: Owning crypto is technically a gray area, but trading it, mining it, or using it for payments is strictly illegal. Courts have ruled that crypto assets have property status, but commercial activity is banned.Q: Can I travel with my hardware wallet to a banned country?
A: Generally, yes. Customs agents rarely check for Ledger or Trezor devices. However, you may find it impossible to access exchange websites or sell your crypto for local cash once you are inside the country.Q: Why do countries ban crypto?
A: The primary reasons are to prevent capital flight (money leaving the country), to protect a weak local currency, or to eliminate competition for a state-issued Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC).2026-01-23 · 12 days ago
Popular Tags
Popular Questions
How to Use Bappam TV to Watch Telugu, Tamil, and Hindi Movies?
How to Withdraw Money from Binance to a Bank Account in the UAE?
ISO 20022 Coins: What They Are, Which Cryptos Qualify, and Why It Matters for Global Finance
Bitcoin Dominance Chart: Your Guide to Crypto Market Trends in 2025
The Best DeFi Yield Farming Aggregators: A Trader's Guide