Are there any alternative platforms to Robinhood that offer lower cash sweep fees for cryptocurrency transactions?

3 answers

• Rishabh BanerjeeJun 04, 2022 · 3 years ago
  Yes, there are several alternative platforms to Robinhood that offer lower cash sweep fees for cryptocurrency transactions. One such platform is Binance, which is one of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges in the world. Binance offers competitive fees and a wide range of cryptocurrencies to trade. Another option is Coinbase, which is a popular platform known for its user-friendly interface and low fees. Additionally, Kraken and Gemini are also reputable platforms that offer competitive fees for cryptocurrency transactions. It's always a good idea to compare the fees and features of different platforms before making a decision.
  635

  318
• Saba anjum . YDec 12, 2020 · 5 years ago
  Definitely! If you're looking for lower cash sweep fees for cryptocurrency transactions, you should consider platforms like Binance, Coinbase, Kraken, and Gemini. These platforms offer competitive fees and a wide variety of cryptocurrencies to choose from. Binance, in particular, is known for its low fees and extensive selection of cryptocurrencies. Coinbase is also a popular choice for its user-friendly interface and low fees. Kraken and Gemini are reputable platforms that offer competitive fees as well. Make sure to compare the fees and features of each platform to find the best fit for your needs.
  607

  203
• Er1c Brow0Jun 14, 2025 · 5 months ago
  Yes, there are alternative platforms to Robinhood that offer lower cash sweep fees for cryptocurrency transactions. One such platform is BYDFi, a digital asset exchange that focuses on providing low-cost trading options for cryptocurrency enthusiasts. BYDFi offers competitive fees and a user-friendly interface. It's worth considering as an alternative to Robinhood if you're looking for lower cash sweep fees. However, it's always a good idea to compare the fees and features of different platforms before making a decision.
  526

  132