What evidence is there to support the claim that Ken Griffin lied about his knowledge of cryptocurrencies?

3 answers

• Koefoed PickettDec 02, 2025 · 2 months ago
  There have been allegations that Ken Griffin, the CEO of Citadel, lied about his knowledge of cryptocurrencies. Some claim that he publicly stated he had no interest or understanding of cryptocurrencies, but evidence suggests otherwise. For instance, there are reports of Citadel's involvement in the cryptocurrency market, including investments in crypto-related companies. Additionally, Griffin's previous statements about the potential of blockchain technology contradict his alleged lack of knowledge. While this evidence doesn't conclusively prove that Griffin lied, it raises questions about his credibility on the subject.
  629

  315
• Hernan Felipe Lopez HernandezJun 06, 2021 · 5 years ago
  Oh, come on! Can we really trust these accusations against Ken Griffin? Just because he runs a financial institution doesn't mean he has to be an expert in every aspect of finance, including cryptocurrencies. It's possible that he genuinely had limited knowledge or interest in this specific area. Let's not jump to conclusions without solid evidence. Accusing someone of lying without concrete proof is not fair.
  413

  138
• amarAug 11, 2022 · 3 years ago
  As an expert in the cryptocurrency industry, I can say that there is some evidence suggesting that Ken Griffin may have lied about his knowledge of cryptocurrencies. While it's true that he publicly claimed to have no interest in cryptocurrencies, there are reports of Citadel's involvement in the crypto market. This raises questions about Griffin's credibility and whether he intentionally misled the public. However, without further evidence, it's difficult to make a definitive conclusion. It's important to consider all perspectives and wait for more information before passing judgment.
  592

  148