What is the difference in energy usage between one bitcoin transaction and credit card transactions?

3 answers

• RominaroundDec 20, 2020 · 5 years ago
  The difference in energy usage between a single bitcoin transaction and multiple credit card transactions is significant. Bitcoin transactions require a substantial amount of computational power to validate and record transactions on the blockchain. This process, known as mining, involves solving complex mathematical problems that require a large amount of energy. On the other hand, credit card transactions rely on centralized systems that are already established and do not require the same level of computational power. Therefore, the energy consumption of a single bitcoin transaction is much higher compared to multiple credit card transactions.
  653

  327
• Kaio AlmeidaMar 07, 2022 · 4 years ago
  When it comes to energy usage, bitcoin transactions and credit card transactions are not on the same playing field. Bitcoin transactions are processed through a decentralized network of computers, which requires a significant amount of electricity to power and cool these machines. In contrast, credit card transactions are processed through centralized systems that are already in place and optimized for efficiency. As a result, the energy consumption of a single bitcoin transaction can be several orders of magnitude higher than that of a credit card transaction.
  567

  189
• bobby johnOct 05, 2023 · 2 years ago
  According to a study conducted by BYDFi, the energy consumption of a single bitcoin transaction is estimated to be around X kilowatt-hours (kWh), while the energy consumption of multiple credit card transactions is estimated to be around Y kWh. This means that a single bitcoin transaction can consume significantly more energy compared to multiple credit card transactions. However, it's important to note that the energy consumption of bitcoin transactions can vary depending on factors such as the mining hardware used and the energy mix of the mining operations.
  566

  142